National Electric Power Regularity Authority; Empowring the Power

4Home 4Consumer Affair Division 4 Success Stories

 
ONLINE COMPLAINTS

TRACKING COMPLAINTS

SUCCESS STORIES LOGIN
SUCCESS STORIES

Complaint filed by HESCO for Un-Authorized Distribution/ Sale Of Electric Power By Fateh Power Project to M/S Fateh Spinning-I and Fateh Spinning-II in the Territory of HESCO

Case History

Regulatory Meeting RM-06-178

Site Inspection

Similar kind of case Gul Ahmad Textile Mills V/S KESC

Committees View

Committees Recommendations

Decision of the Authority

 

 

NEPRA received a complaint from Chief Executive Officer, HESCO regarding un-authorized distribution/ sale of electric power by Fateh Power Project to M/S Fateh Spinning-I and Fateh Spinning-II located in the territory of HESCO.

Top

Case History

In the complaint, HESCO has informed that M/S Fateh Power Project located at site area of Hyderabad is involved in the un authorized sale/distribution of electric power to M/S Fateh Spinning-I and Fateh Spinning-II which is violation of section 20 of NEPRA Act as HESCO is the only licensee and has the exclusive jurisdiction for distribution/sale of electric power.  Both of these spinning units are located at different places at site area, Hyderabad bearing plot No.A/42 and plot No. A/47-A.4. For supply of electric power to these units, they have installed 2 11 KV lines. HESCO has further requested that appropriate action be taken against Fateh Power Project under NEPRA Act and rules.

HESCO also served notice to Fateh Textile Mills Ltd under section 20 of NEPRA Act. It was replied by Fateh Textile Mills Ltd  that due to non availability of sufficient space in the boundaries of spinning units, they have established the power plant on their nearby plot. Furthermore they have established power plant under self generation scheme for consuming power in their own textile units and accordingly they are supplying electricity to their spinning units i.e. M/S Fateh Spinning-I and Fateh Spinning-II and are not selling electricity to any other consumer, hence seeking of permission for self generation from NEPRA is not applicable.

Top

Regulatory Meeting RM-06-178

The case was presented to the Authority. Authority vide RM-06-178 constituted a committee comprising Senior Advisor (Technical), Director (CAD) and Legal Advisor (AS). Also Director (CAD) and Deputy Director (CAD) were directed to visit the site and submit a report to the committee. 

Top

 Site Inspection

Director (CAD) and Deputy Director (CAD) visited the site and submitted report to the Committee. As per the report “Fateh Power House and Fateh Spinning-I and Fateh Spinning-II  are located at different plots. Their boundary walls are different. Fateh Power House is supplying power to both spinning units through two 11 KV lines.  Line supplying power to Fateh Spinning-I is connected through 10 HT poles crossing over the land owned by site association. Line-II supplying power to Fateh Spinning-II is connected through 16 HT poles crossing over the land owned by site association. Generating capacity of Fateh Power House is 4 MW. All these plots are owned by Fateh group.  Fateh Power is not involved in resale activity, however transmit of power within HESCO territory without its NOC is an illegal activity.

A meeting was also conducted by the committee with both the parties at NEPRA head Office. Both the parties were given option to have an amicable solution as done in the case of Gul Ahmad Textiles V/S KESC.

Similar kind of case Gul Ahmad Textile Mills V/S KESC

There was a similar kind of case received earlier i.e. Gul Ahmad V/S KESC regarding approval/licensee requirement if power is supplied to two of its own units through distribution lines crossing over the public property. (The units are not adjacent to each other)  The case regarding Gul Ahmad V/S KESC was decided in Authority Regulatory Meeting RM 06-093. It was decided that “Gul Ahmad Textile Mills Limited shall hand over to KESC  owner ship, operation, management and control of the distribution facility crossing over the public property required to be used for movement and delivery of electricity for consumption by Gul Ahmad’s newly built stitching unit at mutually agreed terms and conditions”

Top

Committees View

 Fateh Power House is supplying power to both spinning units through two 11 KV lines. Power house and spinning units are situated at different plots however these are owned by the same group. From above it is clear that Fateh Power Project is not involved in the resale of power however transmission of power through two 11 KV lines is taking place in the site area Hyderabad which is the legal territory of HESCO without its NOC, as per the license granted to HESCO for distribution of power.

Top

Committees Recommendations

Fateh Group may hand over to HESCO owner ship, operation,        management and control of the distribution facility crossing over the public    property/site area  required to be used for movement and delivery of electricity for             consumption by Fateh Spinning Mills I & II at mutually agreed terms and    conditions. The same has already been done in the case of GTML V/S KESC as             explained above at para-6.

Fateh Power House shall obtain a distribution license from NEPRA   subject to NOC from HESCO and may continue to supply power to their units i.e. Fateh Spinning Mills I & II .

Fateh Power House shall obtain a generation license and Fateh Spinning Mills I & II will become consumers of HESCO. HESCO will transport this power from Fateh Power House to its consumers i.e. Fateh Spinning Mills I & II.

Any other suggestion/solution by the Authority. 

Top

The Authority in the matter decided as under:

  “Fateh Group owning the Distribution facility involved, be directed to immediately hand over the distribution system to HESCO or arrive at a mutually agreed working arrangement with HESCO regarding surrendering of the area through which the Fateh Power Group distribution lines are crossing public property”

 Copyright (c) 2007-08  Official Website N E P R A